Abstract

Previous studies recording eye gaze during face perception have rendered somewhat inconclusive findings with respect to fixation differences between familiar and unfamiliar faces. This can be attributed to a number of factors that differ across studies: the type and extent of familiarity with the faces presented, the definition of areas of interest subject to analyses, as well as a lack of consideration for the time course of scan patterns. Here we sought to address these issues by recording fixations in a recognition task with personally familiar and unfamiliar faces. After a first common fixation on a central superior location of the face in between features, suggesting initial holistic encoding, and a subsequent left eye bias, local features were focused and explored more for familiar than unfamiliar faces. Although the number of fixations did not differ for un-/familiar faces, the locations of fixations began to differ before familiarity decisions were provided. This suggests that in the context of familiarity decisions without time constraints, differences in processing familiar and unfamiliar faces arise relatively early – immediately upon initiation of the first fixation to identity-specific information – and that the local features of familiar faces are processed more than those of unfamiliar faces.

Highlights

  • Recognizing whether a face belongs to a familiar person is an important skill for social behavior

  • The present study analyzed in detail the differences in scan patterns while participants performed familiarity decisions during presentation of unfamiliar and personally familiar faces

  • The initial fixation, directed towards the average face, did not fall on the geometric center of the face stimulus, which would be located below, but rather on a slightly higher location. This fixation location may correspond to the center of mass (Hsiao and Cottrell, Figure 4 | Accuracy as a function of number of fixations prior to recognition, separately for (A) familiar and (B) unfamiliar face stimuli

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recognizing whether a face belongs to a familiar person is an important skill for social behavior. Given the inverse relationship between the size of a visual region and the quality of information provided when moving from foveal to peripheral vision (Larson and Loschky, 2009), observers’ eye movements are functional in that they allow detailed representation of critical information (Desimone and Duncan, 1995; Egeth and Yantis, 1997). These eye movements involve an alternation between stable gaze positions or fixations, in which the retinal input is processed and the position of the fixation is determined, and fast movements of the gaze between two fixation positions (Rayner, 1998). Fixation positions are thought to be determined by both the stimulus characteristics and the top-down task requirements (Dodge, 1903; Westheimer, 1954; Yarbus, 1957; Robinson, 1964; Posner, 1980)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call