Abstract

‘Design fixation’ occurs when exploration of the solution space is unintentionally constrained by designers’ knowledge of prior solutions. The study of fixation is well established in design research but there has been little discussion of what might be learned about fixation from studying related phenomena in other creative practices. To address this, a series of interviews were conducted with technology entrepreneurs and the advisors who guide them. Analysis of the interview data was informed by concepts of creative fixation, cognitive entrenchment and psychological ownership, but also concepts of entrepreneurial pivoting, strategic change and business model innovation. The study shows that entrepreneurs must actively balance persistence with flexibility, a task that is influenced by (i) the entrepreneurs’ commitment to their ideas, (ii) the expertise that they have developed, (iii) the information that they seek or are exposed to, (iv) the resources available to them, and (v) their orientation towards either the product or the market. Collectively, these findings can be applied to design research as proposals for new topics to study when investigating fixation. They also hold implications for design practice by suggesting what designers (and their managers) should reflect on when identifying opportunities to change design direction.

Highlights

  • The term ‘design fixation’ was coined by Jansson and Smith (1991) to refer to ‘a blind adherence to a set of ideas or concepts limiting the output of conceptual design’ (p. 3)

  • The study of fixation is well established in design research but there has been little discussion of what might be learned about fixation from studying related phenomena in other creative practices

  • The study shows that entrepreneurs must actively balance persistence with flexibility, a task that is influenced by (i) the entrepreneurs’ commitment to their ideas, (ii) the expertise that they have developed, (iii) the information that they seek or are exposed to, (iv) the resources available to them, and (v) their orientation towards either the product or the market. These findings can be applied to design research as proposals for new topics to study when investigating fixation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The term ‘design fixation’ was coined by Jansson and Smith (1991) to refer to ‘a blind adherence to a set of ideas or concepts limiting the output of conceptual design’ (p. 3). This definition described what Jansson and Smith found in experiments with participants working on creative design tasks When these designers were set a problem and presented with an example solution they tended to repeat key features of that solution. As these features were intentionally problematic (e.g., they contradicted the brief) this feature repetition was taken to be inadvertent and counterproductive. Fixation is a concern for those developing analogical design support tools (Töre Yargin & Crilly, 2015), which provide stimuli intended to promote creative ideas (see Chakrabarti, Sarkar, Leelavathamma, & Nataraju, 2005; Cheong & Shu, 2013; Deldin & Schuknecht, 2013; Goel, Vattam, Wiltgen, & Helms, 2012)

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call