Abstract

To evaluate the impact of age, body mass index (BMI), and symptom duration on 5-year clinical outcomes among females following primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of hip arthroscopy patients with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Patients were stratified by age (<30, 30-45, ≥45 years), BMI (<25.0, 25.0-29.9, ≥30.0), and preoperative symptom duration (<1 vs ≥1 year). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS). Pre- to postoperative improvement in mHHS and NAHS was compared between groups using the Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test. Hip survivorship rates and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement rates were compared with Fisher exact test. Predictors of outcomes were identified using multivariable linear and logistic regression. P values <.05 were considered significant. In total, 103 patients were included in the analysis with a mean age of 42.0 ± 12.6 years (range, 16-75) and mean BMI of 24.9 ± 4.8 (range, 17.2-38.9). Most patients had symptoms of duration ≥1 year (60.2%). Six patients (5.8%) had arthroscopic revisions, and 2 patients (1.9%) converted to total hip arthroplasty by 5-year follow-up. Patients with BMI ≥30.0 had significantly lower postoperative mHHS (P= .03) and NAHS (P= .04) than those with BMI <25.0. Higher BMI was associated with reduced improvement in mHHS (β= -1.14, P= .02) and NAHS (β= -1.34, P < .001) and lower odds of achieving the mHHS MCID (odds ratio [OR]= 0.82, P= .02) and NAHS MCID (OR= 0.88, P= .04). Older age was predictive of reduced improvement in NAHS (β= -0.31, P= .046). Symptom duration ≥1 year was predictive of higher odds of achieving the NAHS MCID (OR= 3.98, P= .02). Female patients across a wide range of ages, BMIs, and symptom durations experience satisfactory 5-year outcomes following primary hip arthroscopy, but higher BMI is associated with reduced improvement in patient-reported outcomes. Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.