Abstract
It is by now obligatory for discussions such as this to begin with a slashing attack on the typical introductory course in sociology as superficial, unscientific, unduly eclectic, moralistic, thin in substance, boringly focused on antiquated concepts and ... and I'm glad I don't have to teach it. In point of fact, every word is true. The average introductory course is superficial, unscientific, unduly eclectic, moralistic, thin in substance, boringly focused on antiquated concepts, and I am really glad I don't have to teach it. However, I seek to take the high road of constructive suggestions and therefore eschew the demagoguery of beginning with a slashing attack on the typical introductory course for being
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
