Abstract
Network analysis is increasingly appreciated as a methodology in the social sciences. In recent years, it is also receiving attention among historians of science. History of economics is no exception in that researchers have begun drawing on network analysis to analyze social relationships within scientific communities, the spread of economic theories across fields, the visualization of archival material, or the emergence of subfields within the discipline of economics. While this literature is not yet extensive, a debate is emerging about possible contributions of network analysis towards addressing questions that are pertinent to the history of economics. With this paper, we want to push this debate one step further by identifying and discussing five such contributions. We offer reasons why network analysis should have a future as a methodology in the history of economics. Despite its potentials, however, we also acknowledge several limitations. Specifically, we argue that network analysis is ultimately a complementary methodology in the history of economics. It cannot replace more traditional methods but must rely on them to fully develop its potentials.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.