Abstract

Whereas psychophysicists may formulate hypotheses about appearance, they can only measure performance. Bias and imprecision in psychophysical data need not necessarily reflect bias and imprecision in perception. Sensory systems may exaggerate the differences between each item and its neighbors in an ensemble. Alternatively, sensory systems may homogenize the ensemble, thereby removing any apparent differences between neighboring items. Ensemble perception may be involuntary when observers attempt to report the identities of individual items. Conversely, when asked to make a (voluntary) decision about the ensemble as a whole, observers may find it very difficult to compute statistics that are based on more than a very small number of individual items. Modeling decisions about prothetic continua, such as size and contrast, can be tricky because sensory signals may be distorted before and/or after voluntarily computing ensemble statistics. With metathetic continua, such as spatial orientation, distortion is less problematic; physically vertical things necessarily appear close to vertical and physically horizontal things necessarily appear close to horizontal. Decision processes are corrupted by noise that, like distortion, may be added to sensory signals prior to and/or after voluntarily computing ensemble statistics.

Highlights

  • Whereas psychophysicists may formulate hypotheses about appearance, they can only measure performance

  • The ginkgo leaves fell like fine rain from the boughs and dotted the lawn with yellow. . . . I said I would like to distinguish the sensation of each single ginkgo leaf from the sensation of all the others, but I was wondering if it would be possible. –Italo Calvino, If on a winter’s night a traveler (1998/1979, p. 199)

  • It is my hope that some of what follows may serve as a tutorial to students of ensemble perception

Read more

Summary

Appearance v performance

The epigraph suggests that individual sensations may depend on whether they form part of an ensemble. Morgan and Solomon (2019) asked observers to select the odd man out in a variety of visual search tasks, where performance is determined by the target’s relative salience (i.e., how different it appears from the distractors). The truly vertical central elements on either side of the black fixation spot should appear to be tilted in opposite directions when you stare directly between them This can be described as an exaggeration of the difference between the orientation of each central element and the orientation of its flanking distractors. They represent trials in which flankers were tilted either 22° degrees clockwise or 22° degrees counterclockwise of horizontal When these flankers were present, they produced a negative or “repulsive” bias of roughly 10° when observers attempted to report the orientations of near-horizontal targets.

Involuntary averaging v voluntary averaging
Prothetic v metathetic continua
Early v late noise
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call