Abstract

The computation of tautomer ratios of druglike molecules is enormously important in computer-aided drug discovery, as over a quarter of all approved drugs can populate multiple tautomeric species in solution. Unfortunately, accurate calculations of aqueous tautomer ratios—the degree to which these species must be penalized in order to correctly account for tautomers in modeling binding for computer-aided drug discovery—is surprisingly difficult. While quantum chemical approaches to computing aqueous tautomer ratios using continuum solvent models and rigid-rotor harmonic-oscillator thermochemistry are currently state of the art, these methods are still surprisingly inaccurate despite their enormous computational expense. Here, we show that a major source of this inaccuracy lies in the breakdown of the standard approach to accounting for quantum chemical thermochemistry using rigid rotor harmonic oscillator (RRHO) approximations, which are frustrated by the complex conformational landscape introduced by the migration of double bonds, creation of stereocenters, and introduction of multiple conformations separated by low energetic barriers induced by migration of a single proton. Using quantum machine learning (QML) methods that allow us to compute potential energies with quantum chemical accuracy at a fraction of the cost, we show how rigorous relative alchemical free energy calculations can be used to compute tautomer ratios in vacuum free from the limitations introduced by RRHO approximations. Furthermore, since the parameters of QML methods are tunable, we show how we can train these models to correct limitations in the underlying learned quantum chemical potential energy surface using free energies, enabling these methods to learn to generalize tautomer free energies across a broader range of predictions.

Highlights

  • The most common form of tautomerism, prototropic tautomerism describes the reversible structural isomerism involving the sequential processes of bond cleavage, skeletal bond migration and bond reformation in which a hydrogen is transferred.[1]

  • Since we are interested in tautomeric free energy differences in solution we investigate the possibility to optimize the quantum machine learning (QML) parameters to include crucial solvent effects

  • The framework we have developed to perform alchemical relative free energy calculations enables us to obtain a relative free energy estimate that can be optimized with respect to the QML parameters

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The most common form of tautomerism, prototropic tautomerism describes the reversible structural isomerism involving the sequential processes of bond cleavage, skeletal bond migration and bond reformation in which a hydrogen is transferred.[1] Numerous chemical groups can show prototropic tautomerism. Common examples include keto–enol (shown in Fig. 2), amide/ imidic acid, lactam/lactim, and amine/imine tautomerism.[2]. Tautomerism in uences many aspects of chemistry and biology. Tautomerism adds a level of mutability to the static picture of chemical compounds. The change in the chemical structure aComputational and Systems Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. E-mail: marcus.wieder@ choderalab.org bTri-Institutional PhD Program in Computational Biology and Medicine, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, NY 10065, USA † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call