Abstract

A commonly cited reason for the failure of time-area closures to achieve fisheries management goals is the displacement of fishing effort from inside the closure into the surrounding area still open to fishing. Designing time-area closures that are predicted to achieve management goals under multiple spatial patterns of effort redistribution will increase chances of success. Using data from an estuarine gill net fishery, we tested if there are time-area closures predicted to reduce bycatch of two protected species groups while maintaining target catch under four simulated effort redistribution patterns. We found that the pattern of effort redistribution had a substantial impact on the amount of predicted bycatch in each closure scenario. Multiple closures were predicted to reduce bycatch of these species under all four simulations of effort redistribution. However, some combinations of closure and effort redistribution pattern resulted in estimated bycatch being higher than without a closure. We did not find any time-area closures that resulted in a predicted reduction in bycatch while maintaining target catch at original levels. We demonstrate a simple way for fisheries managers to account for the uncertainty in fishers' behavior by designing time-area closures that are predicted to reduce bycatch under multiple potential patterns of spatial redistribution of fishing effort.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe unintentional catch of non-target species (e.g. finfish, sea turtles, marine mammals), is a global problem that occurs with almost every type of fishing gear [1]

  • Bycatch, or the unintentional catch of non-target species, is a global problem that occurs with almost every type of fishing gear [1]

  • Bycatch in gill nets has been listed as one of the major sources of human-induced mortality for Atlantic sturgeon in the southeastern United States [22], and Atlantic sturgeon are listed as endangered in the Carolina Distinct Population Segment under the Endangered Species Act (ESA)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The unintentional catch of non-target species (e.g. finfish, sea turtles, marine mammals), is a global problem that occurs with almost every type of fishing gear [1]. Bycatch in fishing gear has been cited as contributing to decline of sea turtle populations worldwide [25], and all five species of sea turtles that are found in NC waters are listed as endangered or threatened under the ESA. Of these five species, three are commonly caught in gill nets in NC [24]: the green sea turtle (listed as threatened in the North Atlantic Ocean Distinct Population Segment), loggerhead sea turtle (listed as threatened in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean Distinct Population Segment), and Kemp’s ridley sea turtle (listed as endangered throughout its range)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call