Fish production in freshwaters: Are rivers more productive than lakes?

Abstract

Community fish production data were summarized from the literature to test the hypothesis that production is higher in rivers than in lakes. Average community production at 55 river sites was three times greater (273 kg∙ha−1∙year−1) than at 22 lakes (82 kg∙ha−1∙year−1). Higher production (P) in rivers resulted from much higher densities of fish (14 times) and greater biomass (B) (about 2 times). Average fish weight and P/B ratios were inversely correlated. Average fish weight was 7 times less, and P/B ratios were 1.5 times higher (after correction for fish size), in rivers than in lakes. Thus, rivers not only had higher average biomasses of fish but also the turnover rate of the biomass was greater. Fish production was positively correlated with phosphorus in both lakes and rivers. Information on community fish production supported the hypothesis that the productivity of river habitat is, on average, higher than the productivity of lake habitat. The productive capacity of freshwater habitats can be predicted using a multiple regression model developed by Boudreau and Dickie (Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 46: 614. 1989), where fish production is calculated from average fish biomass and body mass.