Abstract
Abstract This paper shows that failing to distinguish between permanent (low frequency) and temporary (high frequency) aid results in misleading estimates of the fiscal responses to aid. I focus on foreign grants received by sub-Saharan Africa over the period 1990–2016, and I separately identify the fiscal responses to permanent and temporary foreign aid. Permanent and temporary aid generates fiscal responses that are meaningfully different on the components of expenditure and domestic borrowing. Temporary aid is associated with fiscal adjustments, such as lower domestic borrowing and increasing recurrent expenditure, while permanent aid is associated with higher public investments. Results provide important policy implications regarding the macroeconomic effects of foreign aid and the design of aid programs to developing countries.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
