Abstract
Studying the driving factors of environmental pollution is of great importance for China. Previous literature mainly focused on the cause of national aggregate emission changes. However, research about the effect of fiscal expenditures on science and technology (FESTs) on environmental pollution is rare. Considering the large gap among cities in China, it is necessary to investigate whether and how FESTs affect environmental pollution among cities. We adopted three kinds of typical environmental pollutants including sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions, wastewater emission, and atmospheric particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter (PM2.5). Using the data of 260 prefecture-level cities over ten years in China, we found that FESTs play a significantly positive role in reducing sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions and PM2.5 concentrations, but fail to alleviate wastewater emissions. Specifically, for every 1% increase in FESTs, SO2 emissions were reduced by 5.317% and PM2.5 concentrations were reduced by 5.329%. Furthermore, we found that FESTs reduced environmental pollution by impeding fixed asset investments and by promoting research and development activities (R&D). Moreover, the impacts of FESTs on environmental pollution varied across regions and sub-periods. Our results are robust to a series of additional checks, including alternative econometric specifications, generalized method of moments (GMM) analysis and overcoming potential endogeneity with an instrumental variable. Our findings confirm that government efforts can be effective on pollution control in China. Hence, all governments should pay more attention to FESTs for sustainable development and environmental quality improvements.
Highlights
Over the past 40 years, China’s urbanization and industrialization have progressed rapidly.Simultaneously, this intensive economic development has caused serious environmental pollution.Water and air pollution in particular have seriously affected people’s quality of life and the rephrasing of sustainable regional development [1]
Our study differs from prior researches because we focus on three kinds of underlying mechanisms including research and development activities (R&D), fixed asset investment and environmental pollution intensity and use micro-level city data to explore the impact of FESTs on environmental pollution
The coefficients to WP were insignificant. These results are economically significant, for every 1% increase in FESTs, SO2 emissions were reduced by 5.317% and PM2.5 concentrations were reduced by 5.329%, but the FESTs could not alleviate wastewater emission
Summary
Over the past 40 years, China’s urbanization and industrialization have progressed rapidly. López et al (2011) provided a theoretical model for how both the amount and composition of government spending affected environmental pollution [3]. In line with this stream of research, Hua et al (2018) documented that the public education spending had a negative relationship with SO2 emission [4]. Our study differs from prior researches because we focus on three kinds of underlying mechanisms including R&D, fixed asset investment and environmental pollution intensity and use micro-level city data to explore the impact of FESTs on environmental pollution. Our study provides additional insight into the existing literature, and suggests that local governments should invest more on FESTs to reduce environmental pollution.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International journal of environmental research and public health
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.