Abstract

1049 Background: A phase III randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared first-line therapy with lapatinib and paclitaxel (L+P) versus paclitaxel alone (P) for MBC. In a sub-group analysis of HER2+ patients, time to tumor progression for L+P was significantly improved, with an emerging trend for survival benefit. This analysis models the QOL data in the subset of the randomized ITT population that overexpressed HER2 (FISH+ or IHC3+). Methods: QOL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) questionnaire. Outcome measures included FACT-B total score, trial outcome index (TOI) score and breast cancer subscale (BCS). Higher scores represent better QOL. Patients completed the FACT-B at the screening visit, week 9, every 12 weeks thereafter, and at discontinuation of therapy. The assessment at discontinuation was applied to the next scheduled visit for analyses. Changes from baseline were analyzed using repeated measures models with baseline score as a covariate. Pattern mixture modeling was implemented as a sensitivity analysis. Results: Of 579 randomized patients, 86 were HER-2+ and 85 completed at least one item from the FACT-B (n = 48 L+P; n = 37 P). The baseline characteristics of this subset were well-matched with regard to age, ECOG status, and prior anthracycline use. More patients in the L+P group than in the P group had visceral disease (69% vs 51%) and more were at stage IV (88% vs 78%).Over the first year, the L+P arm demonstrated stable FACT-B scores over time, whereas average scores for patients on paclitaxel monotherapy decreased (change from baseline: L+P p = 0.99; P p = 0.01). Statistically significant differences were observed between treatment arms on the FACT-B (p = 0.05), TOI (p = 0.03), and BCS (p = 0.01). Pattern mixture models suggested more QOL differentiation between treatments among patients who progressed or withdrew within 6 months of study start. Conclusions: Among patients with HER2+ MBC, treatment with L+P resulted in more stable QOL than with P monotherapy. These findings represent clinically important differences between treatment groups. [Table: see text]

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.