Abstract
The $50 billion fraud perpetrated by Bernard Madoff worked for years because his New York-based fund appeared virtually to guarantee high returns. As a result his investors failed to probe the legal plausibility of the exercise. The same phenomenon characterises some crime and reconviction statistics. Which is why the outspoken criticism voiced in early December 2008 by Sir Michael Scholar, Head of the UK Statistics Authority, regarding the premature release by the Home Office of ‘selective’ knife crime statistics was so welcome. Back in 2003, Lord Warner, my predecessor as Chairman of the Youth Justice Board (YJB), trumpeted that the re-offending rate (it should have been described as the reconviction rate) for young offenders subject to non-custodial penalties was 22.5 per cent below that predicted. The announcement prompted Tony Blair publicly to congratulate the YJB on its achievement (YJB, 2003). It seemed implausible (at least to me) at the time and arguably the YJB should have questioned the eviden...
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
