Abstract
0. Greenberg's use of objective measures derived from morphology (for the most part) as a device for typological classification and John Carroll's use of similar measures in a stylistic study of English' suggest that some sort of useful numerical indices might be obtained from syntactical characteristics of languages. Some of the most obvious and frequently mentioned syntactical differences do not easily lend themselves to this technique; for instance, the presence or absence of something which can reasonably be called a 'case system', or 'tense', or 'aspect', the use of structural signs for the subject of intransitive verbs similar to those for either the object or else the subject of transitive verbs, the use of the orders SOV, SVO, VSO, VOS, OSV, or OVS as necessary or preferred in transitive sentences, the presence or absence of an inclusive-exclusive contrast in person markers, of a dual number (or of number as a category at all), of suppletion in the verb system-all these, and many more like them, are difficult to reduce to a meaningful number.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.