Abstract

Research on recommender systems has noted that the ranking of recommended items may play an important role in the performance of recommendation algorithms. To advance recommender systems research beyond the traditional approach that ranks recommended products in descending, it is crucial to understand the cognitive processes that online consumers experience when they evaluate products in a sequence. Drawing on evaluability theory and the order effects perspective, we formulate a scenario in which two products are presented sequentially and each product has two attributes, one of which can be evaluated independently while the other is difficult to evaluate without comparison. Analyses show that in two out of the three cases examined, presenting the most recommended product in the second place will result in stronger consumer purchase intentions and willingness to pay. Research hypotheses are proposed based on the results of the scenario analyses and are empirically tested through three laboratory experiments. In Study 1, evidence for the hypothesized order effects is found for the settings with randomly assigned product recommendations. In Study 2, the same effects are observed for the settings with personalized recommendations generated by a collaborative filtering algorithm. In Study 3, it is shown that such order effects also exist in terms of the recommendation strength of recommender systems. These findings provide novel insights into the behavioral implications of using recommender systems in e-commerce, shedding light on additional means of improving the design of such systems.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call