Abstract
Two models, derived in very different ways but both incorporating the symmetry constraints outlined in the previous paper, are developed for use in simulating Thellier-type palaeointensity experiments. These are then tested against experimental data which endorse them both as powerful tools. They predict that non-ideal behaviour due to MD grain content is sensitive not only to the protocol employed and the vector difference between the partial thermoremanent magnetisations (pTRMs) imparted in the laboratory and the natural remanent magnetisation (NRM), but also to the spacing of the temperature steps and the type of pTRM imparted during the remagnetisation stages. Consistent with experimental studies, the models predict that pTRM checks may fail despite no alteration occurring and that any double-stage experimental protocol will produce non-ideal results to some degree provided that MD grains are present. A single-heating (perpendicular or high-angle single heating) protocol is predicted to remove non-ideal effects provided that the grains obey the symmetry constraints perfectly. However, this remains to be experimentally tested and does not allow for the use of pTRM checks. Five straightforward recommendations for future palaeointensity studies to follow are outlined. These are designed to minimise non-ideal behaviour due to MD grains as far as possible while retaining the capacity to detect and reject those samples which will nonetheless produce significant errors.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.