Abstract

The first observation of the suppressed semileptonic B_{s}^{0}→K^{-}μ^{+}ν_{μ} decay is reported. Using a data sample recorded in pp collisions in 2012 with the LHCb detector, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2 fb^{-1}, the branching fraction B(B_{s}^{0}→K^{-}μ^{+}ν_{μ}) is measured to be [1.06±0.05(stat)±0.08(syst)]×10^{-4}, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second one represents the combined systematic uncertainties. The decay B_{s}^{0}→D_{s}^{-}μ^{+}ν_{μ}, where D_{s}^{-} is reconstructed in the final state K^{+}K^{-}π^{-}, is used as a normalization channel to minimize the experimental systematic uncertainty. Theoretical calculations on the form factors of the B_{s}^{0}→K^{-} and B_{s}^{0}→D_{s}^{-} transitions are employed to determine the ratio of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix elements |V_{ub}|/|V_{cb}| at low and high B_{s}^{0}→K^{-} momentum transfer.

Highlights

  • The first observation of the suppressed semileptonic B0s → K−μþνμ decay is reported

  • This Letter reports the first observation of the decay B0s → K−μþνμ, the measurement of its branching fraction and of the ratio jVubj=jVcbj with B0s → D−s μþνμ as a normalization channel [10]

  • The ratio jVubj=jVcbj is derived in the two q2 regions using calculations of the form factors of the B0s → K− and B0s → D−s transitions based on both light cone sum rule (LCSR) [11,12] and lattice QCD (LQCD)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The first observation of the suppressed semileptonic B0s → K−μþνμ decay is reported. Using a data sample recorded in pp collisions in 2012 with the LHCb detector, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 2 fb−1, the branching fraction BðB0s → K−μþνμÞ is measured to be 1⁄21.06 Æ 0.05ðstatÞÆ 0.08ðsystފ × 10−4, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second one represents the combined systematic uncertainties. This Letter reports the first observation of the decay B0s → K−μþνμ, the measurement of its branching fraction and of the ratio jVubj=jVcbj with B0s → D−s μþνμ as a normalization channel [10].

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.