Abstract
Abstract 535 Introduction: In 2008, first results of a multicenter, international randomized phase III trial (CLL8) were presented, showing superiority of FCR chemoimmunotherapy for response rates and progression-free survival (PFS) when compared to FC chemotherapy. We now report updated results with a longer median observation time of 37.7 months (mo). Methods and Patients: 817 treatment-naive patients (pts) with good physical fitness and CD20-positive CLL randomly (1:1) received treatment with 6 courses of either FCR or FC therapy. Both treatment arms were well balanced with regard to sex, age, stage, genomic aberrations and IGVH gene status. The median age was 61 years (range 30 to 81), 25.7% pts were female in both arms, 64.1% were Binet B, 31% Binet C and 4.9% Binet A. The median cumulative illness rating scale (CIRS) score was 1 (range 0-8). The overall incidences of trisomy 12 and abnormalities of 13q, 11q23, and 17p13 detected by FISH were 12%, 57%, 25%, and 8%, respectively. A mean number of 5.2 treatment courses were delivered in the FCR arm vs 4.8 courses in the FC arm (p=0.006). Dose reductions by more than 10% in at least one treatment course were performed in 47% (FCR) and 27% (FC) of pts (p Results: As of June 2009, the median observation time was 37.7 (mo). 761 pts (FCR 388; FC 371) were evaluable for response, 790 pts (FCR 401; FC 389) for PFS and all for OS. FCR induced a higher overall response rate than FC (95.1 vs 88.4%) and more complete remissions (44.1 vs 21.8%; p As previously reported more hematologic adverse events, particularly neutropenia, were observed with FCR treatment, but this did not result in an increased infection rate. More deaths have occurred in the FC arm (86/396, 21.7%) than in the FCR arm (65/404, 16.1%). In the majority of cases, the underlying cause of death was progressive disease (FC 48/86, FCR 33/65), secondary malignancies (FC 13/86, FCR 5/65) or unrelated causes of death such as myocardial infarction (FC 15/86, FCR 17/65). Treatment related mortality occurred in 8 (2.0%) of pts in each arm. Of these, 7 FC-treated pts and 5 FCR-treated pts died from infections related to treatment. In 7 pts (3 FC vs. 4 FCR), treatment was discontinued before the third treatment course due to fatal toxicity. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate factors predicting outcome. Age, sex, FCR-treatment, response, number of cycles (0-3), 17p-deletion, increased serum levels of thymidine kinase and β2-microglobulin and unmutated IGVH genes were independent prognostic factors predicting OS or PFS. Conclusion: Treatment with FCR chemoimmunotherapy is more effective than FC chemotherapy. The partial failure to demonstrate a benefit for FCR in Binet stage C patients may be related to an insufficient treatment intensity in these patients with higher tumor load. To our knowledge, this is the first time that a randomized trial is able to demonstrate that a specific first-line treatment for CLL results in an improved overall survival. The results corroborate the recommendation to use FCR as standard therapy in physically fit pts with CLL requiring therapy. Disclosures: Hallek: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Fingerle-Rowson: Roche: Honoraria, travel grants. Fink: Roche: Travel grants. Mayer: BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Fresenius: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Hensel: Roche: Honoraria, Travel Grants; Bayer: Honoraria. Hopfinger: Roche: Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hess: Roche: Honoraria. Bergmann: Roche: Honoraria for monitoring and CRFs. Catalano: Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel grants. Seymour: Bayer Schering: Consultancy, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel grants; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Travel Grants. Berrebi: Roche: travel grants. Jaeger: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Travel grants. Trneny: Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Westermann: Roche: Travel Grants. Wendtner: Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Eichhorst: Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Hospira: Honoraria. Staib: Roche: Research Funding. Boettcher: Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel grants. Ritgen: Roche: Research Funding. Mendila: Roche: Employment. Kneba: Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Doehner: Roche: Research Funding. Stilgenbauer: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, travel grants. Fischer: Mundipharma: Research Funding; Roche: travel grants.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.