Abstract

The occurrence of patient longevity exceeding implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) service life has important implications for patient outcomes and the cost of care. Battery capacity as measured in ampere-hours (Ah) is a strong predictor of survival to an elective replacement indicator (ERI) point and 2.1 Ah is the largest-capacity ICD battery in use at our facility. This was a long-term study of ICDs out of service (OOS) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who received a 2.1-Ah cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D). All 2.1-Ah CRT-D systems implanted (n = 418) from August 1, 2008 through August 31, 2016 were included in this retrospective chart review. The primary endpoint was device OOS due to the battery reaching an ERI point, patient death, infection/erosion, advisory/recall, heart transplant, or unspecified. The maximum follow-up period was 10.3 years, with a mean follow-up length of 4.7 years. The most common reason for device OOS was patient death (65.6%), with only 5.7% of devices reaching the ERI point during the study. There was a period of OOS acceleration driven numerically by patient death in the sixth to ninth years of follow-up. Male sex, ischemic cardiomyopathy, elevated creatinine level, advanced age, and reduced ejection fraction were associated with OOS (p < 0.05). To our knowledge, this is the first study to report ICD battery life exceeding patient survival in a chronic heart failure cohort. During an accelerated time of CRT-D OOS (when it is expected that ~98% of 1.0-Ah and 1.4-Ah CRT-D systems reach an ERI point), patient death resulted in substantially more device OOS than battery replacement and avoided costs of complications and generator changes. These results help to explain the elevated risks of CRT-D generator changes in shorter-longevity devices.

Highlights

  • The timing and reason for cardiac resynchronization (CRT) defibrillator (CRT-D) devices being out of service (OOS) has important implications for patient outcomes and the cost of care

  • This study revealed in our HFrEF cohort that the use of a 2.1-Ah battery resulted in a reversal of the longstanding mismatch between device longevity and patient survival

  • We observed an acceleration of CRT-D OOS frequency during the sixth through ninth years of follow-up; during this time, patient deaths (n = 105; 65.6%) resulted in numerically more instances of device OOS than battery replacements did (n = 24, 15%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The timing and reason for cardiac resynchronization (CRT) defibrillator (CRT-D) devices being out of service (OOS) has important implications for patient outcomes and the cost of care. Von Gunten et al concluded in 2016 that overall ICD longevity continued to be 70% at five years, whereas patient survival was 80% at the same time point.[2] These authors suggested that a marked improvement in battery technology with a transition to a ­2.1–ampere-hour (Ah) lithium–m­ anganese battery may reverse this mismatch but cautioned that more data were needed These points were recently echoed by Boriani et al.,[3] who concurred that patient survival still exceeds device longevity while suggesting that extending device longevity further could reduce complications, comply with patient preferences, and improve the cost-effectiveness. Device longevity has been shown to have the largest impact on the cost-e­ ffectiveness of ICD therapy by a reduction in device replacements, hospitalizations, and complications.[3,4]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.