Abstract
Abstract When the U.S. Supreme Court decided First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. Los Angeles, 107 S.Ct. 2378 (1987), 39 ZD 206, many wondered what had happened to Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis, 107 S.Ct. 1232 (1987), 39 ZD 221, decided by the same Court a scant four months before. So, apparently, did the California Court of Appeal. In a resounding affirmation of local land use regulatory authority, the Court of Appeal suggests, but does not hold, that a land use regulation that takes all property is valid and is not a regulatory taking provided it is for the protection of public health and safety. Welfare, the court casts adrift. In the process, the court also lays to rest, at least for now, the question of whether floodplain regulations are compensable.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
