First-Best Policy and Decentralized Mechanisms

  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Similar Papers
Abstract
Translate article icon Translate Article Star icon
Take notes icon Take Notes

Externalities stemming from greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions may drive a wedge between social and private incentives concerning investment and operations in the power sector. While a central planner who internalizes GHG emissions via a Pigouvian tax to curb consumption may yield a first-best policy, decentralized mechanisms are typically deployed in OECD countries’ power sectors in order to align the incentives of private power companies with those of society. Using a bi-level modeling approach, we develop a framework in which a welfare-maximizing policymaker at the upper level sets the renewable portfolio standard (RPS) target for industry, which takes it as a regulatory parameter at the lower level when making its profit-maximizing capacity-expansion and generation-operation decisions. We demonstrate that even in the case of perfect competition, RPS cannot fully align social and private incentives in mitigation of GHG emissions since consumption is not curbed to the same extent as under the first-best policy. Consequently, “too much” renewable energy (RE) investment takes place. This distortion is less pronounced when power companies behave a la Cournot because the exercise of market power already diminishes consumption, thereby reducing the need for RE investment. We illustrate these principles using case studies based on a stylized network and provide techniques for resolving the bi-level problems. Extensions to these cases are explored in the end-of-chapter exercises with implementation of the problem instances in GAMS.

ReferencesShowing 10 of 30 papers
  • Cite Count Icon 327
  • 10.1016/0377-2217(94)00190-n
Optimization methods for electric utility resource planning
  • May 1, 1995
  • European Journal of Operational Research
  • Benjamin F Hobbs

  • Open Access Icon
  • Cite Count Icon 130
  • 10.1109/tste.2016.2555289
Strategic Sizing of Energy Storage Facilities in Electricity Markets
  • Apr 25, 2016
  • IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy
  • Ehsan Nasrolahpour + 3 more

  • Cite Count Icon 488
  • 10.1109/59.918286
Linear complementarity models of Nash-Cournot competition in bilateral and POOLCO power markets
  • May 1, 2001
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
  • B.E Hobbs

  • Cite Count Icon 129
  • 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.022
Designing effective and efficient incentive policies for renewable energy in generation expansion planning
  • Jan 15, 2011
  • Applied Energy
  • Ying Zhou + 2 more

  • Open Access Icon
  • Cite Count Icon 218
  • 10.1090/qam/112751
Duality in quadratic programming
  • Jan 1, 1960
  • Quarterly of Applied Mathematics
  • W S Dorn

  • Open Access Icon
  • Cite Count Icon 16
  • 10.5547/01956574.39.4.eamu
Simultaneous Use of Black, Green, and White Certificate Systems
  • Jul 1, 2018
  • The Energy Journal
  • Eirik S Amundsen + 1 more

  • Open Access Icon
  • Cite Count Icon 52
  • 10.5547/01956574.33.2.5
Green Certificates and Market Power on the Nordic Power Market
  • Apr 1, 2012
  • The Energy Journal
  • Eirik S Amundsen + 1 more

  • Open Access Icon
  • Cite Count Icon 47
  • 10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.160
Policy implications of downscaling the time dimension in power system planning models to represent variability in renewable output
  • Jun 27, 2018
  • Energy
  • Lina Reichenberg + 2 more

  • Cite Count Icon 18
  • 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.008
Restructuring electricity policy and financial models
  • Jun 17, 2009
  • Energy Economics
  • Leonard S Hyman

  • Cite Count Icon 370
  • 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.017
Renewable energy investments under different support schemes: A real options approach
  • Jan 24, 2012
  • European Journal of Operational Research
  • Trine Krogh Boomsma + 2 more

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 70
  • 10.1016/j.joule.2020.08.001
Mitigating Curtailment and Carbon Emissions through Load Migration between Data Centers
  • Aug 25, 2020
  • Joule
  • Jiajia Zheng + 2 more

Mitigating Curtailment and Carbon Emissions through Load Migration between Data Centers

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 1
  • 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.11.008
Major US electric utility climate pledges have the potential to collectively reduce power sector emissions by one-third
  • Dec 1, 2021
  • One Earth
  • Diana Godlevskaya + 2 more

Major US electric utility climate pledges have the potential to collectively reduce power sector emissions by one-third

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 12
  • 10.1111/1467-8551.12533
Imposing versus Enacting Commitments for the Long‐Term Energy Transition: Perspectives from the Firm
  • Jun 8, 2021
  • British Journal of Management
  • Alain Verbeke + 1 more

Imposing versus Enacting Commitments for the Long‐Term Energy Transition: Perspectives from the Firm

  • Book Chapter
  • 10.1007/978-3-030-44866-0_7
Sustainable Transmission Investment
  • Jan 1, 2020
  • Yihsu Chen + 2 more

In Chaps. 4– 6, we treated operational and investment problems from the perspective of power companies. In particular, these firms’ decisions concern generation-capacity expansion and offerings to the electricity market given a particular transmission network. Consequently, the impact of various environmental policies could be examined while taking into account the physical constraints of the network, which are often paramount to the exertion of market power. However, since some environmental policies, e.g., renewable portfolio standards (RPS), aim to incentivize investment in renewable energy (RE) technologies, either expansions to or reinforcements of the transmission grid are necessary. Yet, as discussed in Chap. 1, the restructured nature of the power sector in most OECD countries means that transmission planning is typically conducted by a welfare-maximizing transmission system operator (TSO), whereas generation expansion and operations are carried out by profit-maximizing power companies. Thus, a credible assessment of policy proposals requires a suitable framework that models this distinction between decision makers’ motives directly. Toward that end, we propose a bi-level modeling approach in this chapter in which a TSO at the upper level makes transmission-expansion decisions while constrained by the generators’ decisions at the lower level. After a discussion of the role of the TSO and a survey of the literature, we develop two types of models. Initially, we formulate a benchmark central-planning model that abstracts from the realities of restructured power sectors to provide first-best policy insights stemming from optimal generation and transmission investment in response to the cost of damage from CO\(_2\) emissions. Next, a bi-level modeling approach is taken in which the TSO at the upper level must anticipate the response of industry’s generation-capacity investment and operations. The effectiveness of a carbon tax in inducing socially optimal behavior by industry is investigated. We conclude the chapter with a summary of its content and extensions to the models therein. GAMS codes for implementing the approaches are provided at the end of this chapter.

  • Conference Article
  • Cite Count Icon 1
  • 10.5339/qfarc.2016.eepp1669
On the Development of a Stochastic Model to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Building and Transportation Sectors
  • Jan 1, 2016
  • Somayeh Asadi + 1 more

Energy-related activities are a major contributor of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A growing body of knowledge clearly depicts the links between human activities and climate change. Over the last century the burning of fossil fuels such as coal and oil and other human activities has released carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and other heat-trapping GHG emissions into the atmosphere and thus increased the concentration of atmospheric CO2 emissions. The main human activities that emit CO2 emissions are (1) the combustion of fossil fuels to generate electricity, accounting for about 37% of total U.S. CO2 emissions and 31% of total U.S. GHG emissions in 2013, (2) the combustion of fossil fuels such as gasoline and diesel to transport people and goods, accounting for about 31% of total U.S. CO2 emissions and 26% of total U.S. GHG emissions in 2013, and (3) industrial processes such as the production and consumption of minerals and chemicals, accounting for about 15% of total U.S. CO2 emissions and 12% of total ...

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 29
  • 10.1016/j.joule.2020.10.011
De-risking Renewable Energy Investments in Developing Countries: A Multilateral Guarantee Mechanism
  • Nov 16, 2020
  • Joule
  • David Matthäus + 1 more

De-risking Renewable Energy Investments in Developing Countries: A Multilateral Guarantee Mechanism

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 74
  • 10.1080/14693062.2018.1467826
Which policy instruments attract foreign direct investments in renewable energy?
  • May 27, 2018
  • Climate Policy
  • Ronald Wall + 3 more

Which policy instruments attract foreign direct investments in renewable energy?

  • Research Article
  • 10.1002/gj.5243
Towards a Less Polluted: The Impact of Governance Indicators and Renewable Energy Investments and Technology on Carbon Emissions in European Countries
  • Jun 3, 2025
  • Geological Journal
  • Abdulmuttalip Pilatin + 2 more

ABSTRACTThe impact of renewable energy technologies and investments in reducing carbon levels is important. This issue has been little addressed so far due to a lack of data. The most important feature of this study is that it examines the impact of renewable energy investments and renewable energy technologies on reducing oil‐derived carbon emissions for the first time across 27 European Union countries for the years 2006–2021. Another new aspect of the study is that it divides European countries into two, based on income level, and considers the impact of governance indicators such as regulatory quality, political stability, and democracy on European countries' carbon neutrality targets. For this purpose, the robust Driscoll and Kraay robust estimator panel data method was applied in the study, based on the Hausman test, autocorrelation test, inter‐unit correlation test, and heteroscedasticity tests. The findings show that renewable energy investments and technologies help reduce carbon emissions in different models. In addition, although economic growth is beneficial for the environment, it has been determined that it has an increasing effect on carbon emissions in European countries with higher income levels. Trade openness reduces carbon emissions in high‐income countries and increases them in low‐income countries. Population density contributes to reducing carbon emissions. Overall, the results suggest that European countries need to increase renewable energy investments and support clean technologies to achieve carbon neutrality targets. The study also shows that reducing oil consumption by promoting renewable energy technologies and investments is key for European policymakers to reduce carbon emissions.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 353
  • 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.026
Public policy influence on renewable energy investments—A panel data study across OECD countries
  • Feb 11, 2015
  • Energy Policy
  • Friedemann Polzin + 3 more

Public policy influence on renewable energy investments—A panel data study across OECD countries

  • Book Chapter
  • 10.3726/978-3-653-06116-1/11
5 Public policy influence on renewable energy investments – a panel data study across OECD countries
  • Jul 11, 2016
  • Friedemann F Polzin + 3 more

This paper examines the impact of public policy measures on renewable energy (RE) investments in electricity-generating capacity made by institutional investors. Using a novel combination of datasets and a longitudinal research design, we investigate the influence of different policy measures in a sample of OECD countries to suggest an effective policy mix which could tackle failures in the market for clean energy. The results call for technology-specific policies which take into account actual market conditions and technology maturity. To improve the conditions for institutional investments, advisable policy instruments include economic and fiscal incentives such as feed-in tariffs (FIT), especially for less mature technologies. Additionally, market-based instruments such as greenhouse gas (GHG) emission trading systems for mature technologies should be included. These policy measures directly impact the risk and return structure of RE projects. Supplementing these with regulatory measures such as codes and standards (e.g. RPS) and long-term strategic planning could further strengthen the context for RE investments.

  • PDF Download Icon
  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 19
  • 10.3390/en16073025
A Comparative Perspective of the Effects of CO2 and Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Global Solar, Wind, and Geothermal Energy Investment
  • Mar 26, 2023
  • Energies
  • Azam Ghezelbash + 3 more

Greenhouse gas emissions, including carbon dioxide and non-CO2 gases, are mainly generated by human activities such as the burning of fossil fuels, deforestation, and agriculture. These emissions disrupt the natural balance of the global ecosystem and contribute to climate change. However, by investing in renewable energy, we can help mitigate these problems by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting a more sustainable future. This research utilized a panel data model to explore the impact of carbon dioxide and non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions on global investments in renewable energy. The study analyzed data from 63 countries over the period from 1990 to 2021. Firstly, the study established a relationship between greenhouse gas emissions and clean energy investments across all countries. The findings indicated that carbon dioxide had a positive effect on clean energy investments, while non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions had a negative impact on all three types of clean energy investments. However, the impact of flood damage as a representative of climate change on renewable energy investment was uncertain. Secondly, the study employed panel data with random effects to examine the relationship between countries with lower or higher average carbon dioxide emissions and their investments in solar, wind, and geothermal energy. The results revealed that non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions had a positive impact on investments only in wind power in less polluted countries. On the other hand, flood damage and carbon dioxide emissions were the primary deciding factors for investments in each type of clean energy in more polluted countries.

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 2
  • 10.2139/ssrn.3123125
Using Renewable Portfolio Standards to Accelerate Development of Negative Emissions Technologies
  • Feb 22, 2018
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Anthony Chavez

Using Renewable Portfolio Standards to Accelerate Development of Negative Emissions Technologies

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 43
  • 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.038
Overlapping carbon pricing and renewable support schemes under political uncertainty: Global lessons from an Australian case study
  • May 18, 2017
  • Applied Energy
  • Mahdi Shahnazari + 3 more

Overlapping carbon pricing and renewable support schemes under political uncertainty: Global lessons from an Australian case study

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 2
  • 10.2139/ssrn.2591094
Implementing the Renewable Fuel Standard with the Renewable Portfolio Standard in the US: Implications for Policy Costs and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
  • Apr 8, 2015
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Anthony Oliver + 1 more

Implementing the Renewable Fuel Standard with the Renewable Portfolio Standard in the US: Implications for Policy Costs and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

  • Research Article
  • Cite Count Icon 147
  • 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113683
Towards carbon-neutral world: The effect of renewable energy investments and technologies in G7 countries
  • Aug 30, 2023
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
  • Sinan Erdogan + 2 more

Towards carbon-neutral world: The effect of renewable energy investments and technologies in G7 countries

Save Icon
Up Arrow
Open/Close
  • Ask R Discovery Star icon
  • Chat PDF Star icon

AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.

Search IconWhat is the difference between bacteria and viruses?
Open In New Tab Icon
Search IconWhat is the function of the immune system?
Open In New Tab Icon
Search IconCan diabetes be passed down from one generation to the next?
Open In New Tab Icon