Abstract
AbstractStructural insulated panel (SIP) requires fire‐resistant coating due to its substrate having low melting point. This article presents the effect of filler and binder on fire resistance, thermal stability, and surface morphology of composite coating. Palm oil clinker filler‐type coatings made using ordinary Portland cement (OPC:POC), calcium aluminate cement (CAC:POC), and alkali‐activated geopolymer (GP:POC) binders were analyzed. GP:POC was then compared to other geopolymer‐binder type coating with different fillers such as rice husk ash (GP:RHA), metakaolin (GP:MK), and hybrid filler of POC and RHA (GP:POC‐RHA). It was found that geopolymer binder‐type specimens have better fire‐resistance due to low thermal conductivity caused by their porous microstructure and intumescence behavior. Then, the coating formulation was optimized in terms of thickness, alkaline activator ratio and curing regime which produced GP:RHA' that lasted almost 2 hours during flame exposure test. This article concludes that geopolymer‐binder type composite is a plausible fire‐resistant coating for SIP.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
