Abstract
We investigate the finite size effect on the vector meson and the baryon sectors using a subset of the "PACS10" configurations which are generated, keeping the space-time volumes over (10 fm$)^4$ in 2+1 flavor QCD at the physical point. Comparing the results on (5.5 fm$)^4$ and (10.9 fm$)^4$ lattices the ground states of octet baryons , which are stable on the lattice, show no finite size effect within less than 0.5% level of statistical errors. For those of vector mesons, which are unstable on the lattice, we observe that the effective masses are well below the experimental resonance levels both on (5.5 fm$)^4$ and (10.9 fm$)^4$ lattices. For the decuplet baryon sector we have found that the time dependence of the effective mass looks quite similar to that for the vector meson sector including the $\Omega$ baryon channel. We discuss its origin due to a possible mixing with the nearby multihadron states. Since the $\Xi$ baryon mass can be determined with the smallest ambiguity among the vector meson and the baryon masses, we use it together with the pion and kaon masses as the physical inputs to determine the physical point.
Highlights
The “PACS10” configurations generated by PACS Collaboration have a physical lattice size over ð10 fmÞ4 at the physical point in 2 þ 1 flavor QCD [1]
We observe that the effective masses for all the ρ, KÃ, and φ channels go below the horizontal line in the large time region, which denotes the experimental resonance level with the lattice cutoff determined in Sec
Since it is difficult to find any reasonable plateau for all the channels, we do not try to extract the masses by applying the single exponential fit to the propagators
Summary
The “PACS10” configurations generated by PACS Collaboration have a physical lattice size over ð10 fmÞ4 at the physical point in 2 þ 1 flavor QCD [1]. The other is a comparison at the same axial Ward identity (AWI) quark masses, mAudWI, on both lattices, where the quark masses on the smaller lattice is adjusted to those on the larger one by the reweighting method [3] The former analysis revealed 2.1(8)%, 4.8(1.6)%, and 0.36 (31)% finite size effect on mπ, mAudWI, and fπ, respectively.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.