Abstract
This paper proposes and compares in terms of speed and accuracy two alternative approximation methods employing finite elements to parameterize the true policy functions that solve for the equilibrium of an optimal growth model with leisure and irreversible investment. The occasionally binding constraint in investment is efficiently handled on one algorithm by parameterizing the expectations of the marginal benefit of future physical capital stock and on the other by modifying the planner's problem to include a penalty function. While both methods benefit from the high speed and accuracy achieved by a finite elements approximation, the algorithm incorporating a penalty function in the planner's problem proved being of fastest convergence over a whole range of the model's calibrations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.