Abstract

In the last decades, the long-term structural health monitoring of civil structures has been mainly performed using two approaches: model based and data based. The former approach tries to identify damage by relating the monitoring data to the prediction of numerical (e.g., finite-element) models of the structure. The latter approach is data driven, where measured data from a given state condition are compared to the baseline or reference condition. A challenge in both approaches is to make the distinction between the changes of the structural response caused by damage and environmental or operational variability. This issue was tackled here using a hybrid technique that integrates model- and data-based approaches into structural health monitoring. Data recorded in situ under normal conditions were combined with data obtained from finite-element simulations of more extreme environmental and operational scenarios and input into the training process of machine-learning algorithms for damage detection. The addition of simulated data enabled a sharper classification of damage by avoiding false positives induced by wide environmental and operational variability. The procedure was applied to the Z-24 Bridge, for which 1 year of continuous monitoring data were available.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.