Abstract
The ongoing debate surrounding the surgical treatment of trochanteric hip fractures, particularly unstable fractures, has led to continuous changes in the design of well-established implants and to the development of new ones. The goal of this paper was to use a finite element simulation to compare the biomechanical behaviour of two intramedullary implants most often used at the University Hospital of Zaragoza: the standard Gamma ® nail (Howmedica) and the proximal femoral nail (PFN ®, Stratec). The main focus was on the displacements of the fracture focus and the stress distributions along the femur and the implant. Both nails produced an important redistribution of stress in the bone tissue, but the redistribution of peak stress was higher for the Gamma ® nail. On the other hand, with PFN ® there were smaller displacements at the fracture site. Finally, under the same workload, the Gamma ® nail supported higher stresses than the PFN ®.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
