Abstract

Large-scale additive manufacturing (AM), also known as 3D concrete printing, is becoming well-recognized and, therefore, has gained intensive research attention. However, this technology requires appropriate specifications and standard guidelines. Furthermore, the performance of printable concrete in elevated temperature circumstances has not yet been explored extensively. Hence, the authors believe that there is a demand for a set of standardized findings obtained with the support of experiments and numerical modelling of the fire performance of 3D-printed concrete structural elements. In general, fire experiments and simulations focus on ISO 834 standard fire. However, this may not simulate the real fire behaviour of 3D-printed concrete walls. With the aim of bridging this knowledge disparity, this article presents an analysis of the fire performance of 3D-printed concrete walls with biomimetic hollow cross sections exposed to realistic individual fire circumstances. The fire performance of the non-load-bearing 3D-printed concrete wall was identified by developing a suitable numerical heat transfer model. The legitimacy of the developed numerical model was proved by comparing the time–temperature changes with existing results derived from fire experiments on 3D-printed concrete walls. A parametric study of 96 numerical models was consequently performed and included different 3D-printed concrete wall configurations under four fire curves (standard, prolonged, rapid, and hydrocarbon fire). Moreover, 3D-printed concrete walls and mineral wool cavity infilled wall panels showed enhanced fire performance. Moreover, the cellular structures demonstrated superior insulation fire ratings compared to the other configurations.

Highlights

  • In line with the currently available geometries of 3D-printed concrete walls in the construction industry and the cavity provisions proposed by Wang et al [24], this study numerically examined the fire behaviour of advanced wall configurations

  • Since this study focused on 2D analysis, the evaluation of experimental results with 2D finite element analysis (FEA) in ABAQUS is presented in Table 2 evaluation of experimental results with 2D FEA in ABAQUS is presented in Table 2 for for Comparison of Experimental Results of 3D-printed concrete (3DPC) Samples Comparison of Experimental Results of C3DPC Samples

  • The C6 cellular cross-sectional wall panel showed the highest performance under fire among the 100 mm walls, and the CI1 truss cross-sectional wall exhibited the highest performance under fire among the 200 mm walls with mineral wool cavity insulation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The unique advantages of 3DCP are higher potential construction quality, reduced construction time, the possibility of building innovative structures at lower associated costs, the development of material-minimized, resource-saving structures, the optimization of thermal and acoustic properties of buildings, and the reduction in arduous manpower and, increased labour efficiency and safety This process reduces adverse environmental impacts by means of the direct use of natural materials, reduced transportation, reduced waste, and minimal energy usage [1,3,5,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call