Abstract
In recent years, linked bridge deck elements have gained popularity for facilitating more durable components in bridge decks, but these components require field-applied connections for constructing the entire bridge. Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) is started to be a major material for closure pours in bridges and various Department of Transportations have been developing guidelines. UHPC is known by its superior quality than conventional concrete in terms of constructability, strength and durability. So far, very limited data are available on the finite-element modeling (FEM) of hybrid bridge deck connections. In this study, FEMs have been presented to define the crucial factors affecting the response of bridge hybrid deck panel system under monotonic loads. The commercial software ABAQUS was used to validate the modes and to generate the data presented herein and the concrete damage plasticity was used to simulate both conventional concrete and UHPC. Numerical results were validated using available experimental data. The key parameters studied were the mesh size, the dilation angle, reinforcement type, concrete models, steel properties, and the contact behavior between the UHPC and the conventional concrete. The models were found to capture the load–deflection response of experimental results, failure modes, crack patterns and ductility indices show satisfactorily response. A sensitivity test was also conducted by considering various key parameters such as concrete and steel constitutive models and their associated parameters, mesh size, and contact behavior. It is perceived that increasing the dilation angle leads to an increase in the initial stiffness of the model. The damage in concrete under monotonic loading is found higher in normal concrete than UHPC with no signs of de-bonding between the two materials. Changing the dilation angle from 20° to 40° results in an increase of 7.81% in ultimate load for the panel with straight reinforcing bars, whereas for the panel with headed bars, the increase in ultimate load was found 8.56%.
Highlights
The ASCE 2017 report card listed that about 9% of bridges in the USA are classified structurally deficient and each year more than 3000 new bridges are being constructed (Bhide 2008)
In case of headed bar specimens, the stiffness of the composite panel for a dilation angle of 40° was found 9.69% greater than the stiffness found for dilation angle 20°, whereas for the 8G panel, 5.47% higher value of initial stiffness was found for 40° dilation angle
This paper presents a sensitivity analysis based on numerical simulations of the behavior of Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) bridge deck connections under monotonic loading
Summary
The ASCE 2017 report card listed that about 9% of bridges in the USA are classified structurally deficient and each year more than 3000 new bridges are being constructed (Bhide 2008) It has been always a challenge for the bridge engineers to find new ways to build better bridges with reduced construction time. More research has been conducted on developing analytical models to predict that the compressive and tensile strength are conducted As this is not always feasible to conduct large-scale test of UHPC connection of bridge deck elements, a need for developing dependable 3D finite-element model is time worthy. Numerical modeling of UHPC connected deck panels has been always challenging due to non-availability of postpeak behavior of UHPC either under compression or tension loads. It is needed to recognize the major factors which affects the numerical results and evaluate the sensitivity of the material input parameters on the variability and response of the models
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
