Abstract

An assessment of the degree to which the assumptions influence the tubular hydroforming predictions from a strain rate-independent, four-node shell, explicit finite element model is made. Among a list of assumptions, it is found that the minimum element size, process time and contact algorithm must be provided to the recipient of a report on the finite element modeling of tubular hydroforming. It is found that the explicit, four-node, strain rate-independent finite element model: (1) underestimates the burst pressure for materials featuring higher strain rate sensitivity and (2) fails to produce an accurate strain distribution prediction.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call