Abstract
Vertebral compression fractures are one of the most severe clinical consequences of osteoporosis and the most common fragility fracture afflicting 570 and 1070 out of 100,000 men and women worldwide, respectively. Vertebroplasty (VP), a minimally invasive surgical procedure that involves the percutaneous injection of bone cement, is one of the most efficacious methods to stabilise osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. However, postoperative fracture has been observed in up to 30% of patients following VP. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effect of different injectable bone cement formulations on the stress distribution within the vertebrae and intervertebral discs due to VP and consequently recommend the optimal cement formulation. To achieve this, a 3D finite element (FE) model of the T11-L1 vertebral body was developed from computed tomography scan data of the spine. Osteoporotic bone was modeled by reducing the Young's modulus by 20% in the cortical bone and 74% in cancellous bone. The FE model was subjected to different physiological movements, such as extension, flexion, bending, and compression. The osteoporotic model caused a reduction in the average von Mises stress compared with the normal model in the T12 cancellous bone and an increment in the average von Mises stress value at the T12 cortical bone. The effects of VP using different formulations of a novel injectable bone cement were modeled by replacing a region of T12 cancellous bone with the materials. Due to the injection of the bone cement at the T12 vertebra, the average von Mises stresses on cancellous bone increased and slightly decreased on the cortical bone under all loading conditions. The novel class of bone cements investigated herein demonstrated an effective restoration of stress distribution to physiological levels within treated vertebrae, which could offer a potential superior alternative for VP surgery as their anti-osteoclastogenic properties could further enhance the appeal of their fracture treatment and may contribute to improved patient recovery and long-term well-being.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.