Abstract

BackgroundEffect of prosthesis design on occlusal overload and long-term implant stability cannot be overstated. In Porcelain Fused to Metal (PFM) crowns, low cusp inclination and occlusal contacts limited to central fossa ensure axially directed forces on an implant but often pose esthetic and functional challenges. It is theorized that resilient Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) crowns have shock absorption capacity for favorable stress distribution. This study compared two implant crown materials and evaluated the effect of cusp inclination and occlusal contact distribution on resultant stresses. MethodsThirty 3D finite element models of implant-supported PFM and PEEK crowns, generated using Solidedge 3D CAD solid modeling software (v19, Siemens PLM Software Inc.,US), were used to study the effect of 3 cups inclinations (0°, 15°, 30°) under five load conditions, with 300N force distributed over one, two, or three contact areas and exported to ANSYS (v18.1, ANSYS Inc. Pennsylvania, US) for stress analysis. ResultsMaximum stress in both PFM and PEEK models was at the neck of the implant under Load 3(300N distributed over three contact areas: central fossa, buccal cusp tip, marginal ridge). Minimum stress in all models was under Load 1(300N applied at one contact area in central fossa). Maximum stresses were recorded for 30° cusp inclination in PFM models. ConclusionIn both PFM and PEEK crown models, contact areas placed away from the implant axis generated greater implant and peri-implant stresses and had more effect on resultant stresses than that of increase in cusp inclination. The effect of cusp inclination on the resultant stresses was dependent on the crown material.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call