Finite element analysis of different medial fixation strategies in double-plate osteosynthesis for AO type 33-C2 Femoral fractures

Abstract

ObjectivesIn this study, we evaluated the biomechanical characteristics of different locations of medial fixation strategies in double-plate osteosynthesis for fixing AO/ASIF type 33-C2 femoral fractures by means of finite element analysis. MethodsWe used 3-matic software and UG-NX software to construct AO/ASIF type 33-C2 Femoral fractures and lateral less invasive stabilization system (LISS) plates, medial plates (MPs), and medial support pads (MSPs), respectively. Then, the LISS, MP and MSP were assembled into the fracture model separately to form three fixation models: MSP+LISS, anteromedial plate (AMP+LISS), and MP+LISS. In the next procedure, we performed finite element analysis using ANSYS software after meshing the elements of the models in HyperMesh 11.0 software. Loading conditions including lateral-medial four-point bending, anterior-posterior four-point bending, axial loading, and torsional loading were applied to evaluate the biomechanical advantages among the three fixation types. We observed the peak Von Mises Stress (VMS) value, maximum displacement, bending angle in the coronal plane of the fracture, and torsional angle of the fracture to assess the degree of plate deformation and fixation stability. ResultsOur results showed that in both lateral-medial four-point bending and anterior-posterior four-point bending, the calculations of MP+LISS were marginally better than those of AMP+LISS. However, with the action of axial loading and torsional loading, the deformation of MP+LISS was distinctly smaller than that of AMP+LISS, and the fixation stability of MP+LISS was also prominently better. Under lateral-medial four-point bending, the VMS on the lateral plate of MSP+LISS (59.977 MPa) was approximately half of the two double-plate models. Under anterior and posterior four-point bending, the 38.209 MPa peak VMS of MSP+LISS was still superior to the other two double-plate models. Under torsional loading, the peak VMS (347.75 MPa), the maximum torsional angle of the femoral head (7.852 °), and the torsional angle of fracture (0.036 °) of MSP+LISS preceded those of the other two models. However, under axial loading, the peak VMS (76.376 MPa) and the maximum displacement (3.1798 mm) of MSP+LISS were slightly higher than those of MP+LISS. ConclusionThe MSP+LISS model showed better biomechanical performance than the double-plate models, which might be an effective solution for the treatment of comminuted distal femur fractures.