Abstract
This study evaluated the von Mises stress (MPa) and equivalent strain occurring around monolithic yttria-zirconia (Zir) implant using three clinically simulated finite element analysis (FEA) models for a missing maxillary central incisor. Two unidentified patients' cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) datasets with and without right maxillary central incisor were used to create the FEA models. Three different FEA models were made with bone structures that represent a healed socket (HS), reduced bone width edentulous site (RB), and immediate extraction socket with graft (EG). A one-piece abutment-implant fixture mimicking Straumann Standard Plus tissue level RN 4.1 X 11.8mm, for titanium alloy (Ti) and Zir were modeled. 178 N oblique load and 200 N vertical load were used to simulate occlusal loading. Von Mises stress and equivalent strain values for around each implant model were measured. Within the HS and RB models the labial-cervical region in the cortical bone exhibited highest stress, with Zir having statistically significant lower stress-strain means than Ti in both labial and palatal aspects. For the EG model the labial-cervical area had no statistically significant difference between Ti and Zir; however, Zir performed better than Ti against the graft. FEA models suggest that Ti, a more elastic material than Zir, contributes to the transduction of more overall forces to the socket compared to Zir. Thus, compared to Ti implants, Zir implants may be less prone to peri-implant bone overloading and subsequent bone loss in high stress areas especially in the labial-cervical region of the cortical bone. Zir implants respond to occlusal loading differently than Ti implants. Zir implants may be more favorable in non-grafted edentulous or immediate extraction with grafting.
Highlights
Recent demands in esthetics have driven research and clinical applications of monolithic zirconia (Zir) and yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal ceramics or yttria-stabilized Zirconia (Y-TZP) as restorative materials, but to fabricate dental implants
Data measurements along the implants surfaces at the designated regions (Fig 2) from the finite element analysis (FEA) analysis showed that overall a Zir implant has higher internal von Mises stress (MPa) and lower equivalent strain when compared to its titanium alloy (Ti) counterpart (Table 2 and Table 3; Fig 4)
The results suggest that the stress/strain distributions were very similar between the two materials but were significantly different
Summary
By accepting or rejecting the null hypothesis that there is no difference between Ti and Zir on peri-implant bone and graft, the goal of the study is to aid the clinician in establishing a rationale for use of Zir implants in various clinical scenarios a patient may present with in the anterior maxilla
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
