Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine stress levels on supporting structures of implant-retained overdentures as a function of varying degrees of palatal coverage using finite element analysis modeling at different loading angles. Materials and Methods: ABAQUS®-software was used to perform finite element analysis on eight overdenture models with three and four implants and with and without palatal coverage designs. Loads were applied perpendicular and 45º to the implants. Von Mises stress was measured to determine bone stress. A one-way ANOVA determined which model caused the most stress to the maxillary bone. Results: Palatal coverage increased stress to anterior implant in three implant (p = 0.08) models but decreased stress to all implants in four implant models (p = 0.43). Distal implants received more stress than anterior implants for all models. There was no significant difference between a full palate and no palate coverage overdenture prosthesis when a bar was added under axial loading (p = 0.954). Under non-axial loading, a decrease in stress was noted with the bar in all areas except the anterior implant site. Conclusions: Palatal coverage may not be necessary when applying a pure axial load. The addition of a bar decreased stress at loading.

Highlights

  • Maxillary implant-retained overdentures are considered a favorable treatment option for patients with insufficient bone volume, retention, and stability complaints [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]

  • There is conflicting information regarding the influence of palatal coverage on maxillary implant retained overdentures

  • Four-implantretained retainedmaxillary maxillaryoverdenture overdenturedesigned designedwithout withoutand andwith withfull fullpalatal palatalcoverage coverage (C) Three-implant retained maxillary overdenture without and with full palatal coverage designed to excluding excludinga aconnecting connectingbar

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Maxillary implant-retained overdentures are considered a favorable treatment option for patients with insufficient bone volume, retention, and stability complaints [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The impact of palatal coverage design, as well as the effect of implant splinting on the biomechanical behavior of implant-retained maxillary overdentures, is not clear in the literature [14,15,16,17]. There is conflicting information regarding the influence of palatal coverage on maxillary implant retained overdentures. Designs with no palate are selected for patients with large palatal tori or an exacerbated gag reflex, and to improve temperature, motor, and sensory function.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.