Abstract

Curved steel–concrete composite box beams are widely used in urban overpasses and ramp bridges. In contrast to straight composite beams, curved composite box beams exhibit complex mechanical behavior with bending–torsion coupling, including constrained torsion, distortion, and interfacial biaxial slip. The shear-lag effect and curvature variation in the radial direction should be taken into account when the beam is sufficiently wide. Additionally, long-term deflection has been observed in curved composite box beams due to the shrinkage and creep effects of the concrete slab. In this paper, an equilibrium equation for a theoretical model of curved composite box beams is proposed according to the virtual work principle. The finite element method is adopted to obtain the element stiffness matrix and nodal load matrix. The age-adjusted effective modulus method is introduced to address the concrete creep effects. This 26-DOF finite beam element model is able to simulate the constrained torsion, distortion, interfacial biaxial slip, shear lag, and time-dependent effects of curved composite box beams and account for curvature variation in the radial direction. An elaborate finite element model of a typical curved composite box beam is established. The correctness and applicability of the proposed finite beam element model is verified by comparing the results from the proposed beam element model to those from the elaborate finite element model. The proposed beam element model is used to analyze the long-term behavior of curved composite box beams. The analysis shows that significant changes in the displacement, stress and shear-lag coefficient occur in the curved composite beams within the first year of loading, after which the variation tendency becomes gradual. Moreover, increases in the central angle and shear connection stiffness both reduce the change rates of displacement and stress with respect to time.

Highlights

  • Curved steel–concrete composite box beams have gradually become one of the main design types for urban overpasses and ramp bridges due to their light weight, high torsional rigidity, and rapid construction

  • For a steel–concrete composite structure, longitudinal and transverse slips exist at the interface between the steel beam and the concrete slab of the curved composite box beam

  • This paper introduces a constitutive relationship for concrete shrinkage and creep on the basis of the proposed beam finite element and further develops a new finite beam element that can consider the long-term behavior of curved composite box beams

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Curved steel–concrete composite box beams have gradually become one of the main design types for urban overpasses and ramp bridges due to their light weight, high torsional rigidity, and rapid construction. Introduced a time-dependent constitutive model and established a one-dimensional theoretical model that can consider the shear-lag effect and the long-term behavior Based on this model, the long-term behavior of composite beams was studied under prestressed loads [14]. Gara et al [15] introduced a shape function to develop a beam element with 13 DOFs that can consider the interfacial slip in composite beams and the shear-lag effect of concrete slabs and analyzed the long-term behavior of the structure by using a stepwise calculation method. Ranzi and Bradford [16] proposed beam elements for the long-term behavior of composite beams, considering interfacial slip and concrete time-dependent effects according to the direct stiffness method and single-step method.

Basic Hypotheses of the Model
Geometric Dimensions and Coordinate System of the Curved Composite Box Beam
Displacement Modes and Strain Components of Curved Composite Box Beams
Equilibrium Equation for Curved Composite Box Beams
Finite Beam Element for Curved Composite Box Beams
Numerical Validation of the Beam Element Model
Elaborate
Longitudinal
Influence of the Time-Dependent Effects on Shear Lag
Figures and
Change
Influence
10. Figure
Displacement
According to the proposed finite shear connection stiffness values are set as
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.