Fine Tuning between Radical versus Nonradical States of Azoheteroarenes on Selective Osmium Platforms.

Abstract

The article highlights the cooperative impact of azoheteroarenes [abbt: 2,2'-azobis(benzothiazole), L1-L3; bmpd: (E)-1,2-bis(1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-yl) diazene, L4] and coligands [bpy: 2,2'-bipyridine; pap: 2-phenylazopyridine] in tuning radical (N-N•-) versus nonradical (N═N0) states of L on selective OsII-platforms in structurally/spectroscopically characterized monomeric [1]ClO4-[6]ClO4 and [1](ClO4)2-[2](ClO4)2/[7](ClO4)2-[8](ClO4)2, respectively. The preferred syn-configuration of L in the complexes prevented obtaining ligand bridged dimeric species. It revealed that {Os(bpy)2} facilitated the stabilization of both nonradical ([1](ClO4)2-[2](ClO4)2) and radical ([1]ClO4-[2]ClO4) states of L1/L2, while it delivered exclusively the radical form for L3 in [3]ClO4. In contrast, {Os(pap)2} generated radical states of L1-L3 in [4]ClO4-[6]ClO4, respectively, without any alteration of the redox state of OsII and azo (N═N0) function of the pap coligand. The neutral state of L4 was, however, ascertained in [7](ClO4)2 or [8](ClO4)2 irrespective of the nature of the metal fragment {Os(bpy)2} or {Os(pap)2}, respectively. Switching between radical and nonradical forms of L in the complexes as a function L and coligand could be addressed based on their relative FMO (frontier molecular orbital) energies. Multiple close redox steps of the complexes extended a competitive electron transfer scenario between the redox active components including metal/L/bpy/pap, leading to delicate electronic forms in each case.