Abstract
A comparative study of the non-aspiration technique (FNC) with the conventional FNAC is reported in one hundred lesions at different sites. The former technique is based on the principle of capillary action. The sampling was assessed using 3 parameters. Cellular yield Cell architecture preservation Blood & clots in the background. In contrast to FNA sampling, FNC is simple, less traumatic with minimal blood in the background yielding superior quality material in 68% cases at a statistically significant rate. (p<0.01)
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
