Fine Motor Precision Tasks: Sex Differences in Performance with and without Visual Guidance across Different Age Groups.

Liudmila Liutsko,María José Contreras,Josep Maria Tous Ral,Ruben Muiños

doi:10.3390/bs10010036

Abstract

Previous studies have reported certain sex differences in motor performance precision. The aim of the present study was to analyze sex differences in fine motor precision performance for both hands under different test conditions. Fine motor tasks were performed by 220 Spanish participants (ages: 12–95), tracing over the provided models – lines of 40 mm for both hands, two sensory conditions (PV—proprioceptive-visual; P—proprioceptive only) and three movement types (F—frontal, T—transversal, and S—sagittal). Differences in line length (the task focused on precision) were observed through MANOVA analysis for all test conditions, both sexes and different age groups. Sex differences in precision were observed in F and T movement types (statistically significance level and higher Cohens’ d were observed in condition with vision). No statistically significant differences were observed for both hands and sensory conditions in sagittal movement. Sex differences in fine motor precision were more frequently observed in the PV sensory condition in frontal movement and less in sagittal movement.

Highlights

Recent studies on sex differences in motor precision are scarce, with most studies found in a GoogleAcademic search having been carried out in the past century (1980s–1990s)
The descriptive statistics for fine motor precision is given for men (Figure 2) and women
The descriptive statistics for fine motor precision is given for men (Figure 2) and women (Figure (Figure 3) depending on age group (12–17, 18–29, 30–64, and 65–95), hand

Summary

Introduction

Recent studies on sex differences in motor precision are scarce, with most studies found in a GoogleAcademic search having been carried out in the past century (1980s–1990s). Recent studies on sex differences in motor precision are scarce, with most studies found in a Google. Heymans [3] was one of the first to study sex/gender differences, noting that schoolboys were considered to be more active (difficulty in remaining seated quietly) and with preference for active games, whereas girls were characterized by quiet behavior (in the motor, not emotional sense). Such activeness was seen in boys as more aggressive behavior compared to girls

Objectives

Results

Discussion

Conclusion