Abstract
Abstract Personalized medicine is care that is tailored to an individual patient. In contrast, randomized trials are designed to report evidence of benefits and harms “on average”. The average trial participant though, is often healthier than older patients seen in clinical practice. A variety of methods have been proposed which offer improvements to traditional (but questionable) practices of one-subgroup-at-a-time examinations of treatment effect heterogeneity, but translating evidence from these advancements has received less attention. Data Science initiatives have allowed broader data sharing, data harmonization and data synthesizing approaches, as well as an enormous maturing of interactive visualization techniques. Motivated by the SPRINT study and using advanced approaches of marginalized standardization and the Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity (PATH) statement, we show how researchers, regulators, clinicians and patients can "find themselves" on the treatment effect continuum and be better informed of potential individualized evidence through interactive visualizations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
