Abstract
Although Australia exports more than half of its agricultural production, there are food security problems as the current food supply systems in Australia fail to deliver healthy diets to all Australians and fail to protect the natural resources on which they depend. In addition, the food systems create “collateral damage” to the natural environment including biodiversity loss. In coming decades, Australia’s food supply systems will be increasingly challenged by resource price inflation and falling yields due to climate change. Government and business are aiming to increase production and agricultural exports. This will increase pressure on agricultural resources and exacerbate “collateral” damage to the environment. The Australian public has an ongoing interest in issues associated with the food systems including the environment, education, health and sustainability. A health-giving diet is essential for a full life and over a life-time people need food security. Currently economy development and social planning is undertaken through the pragmatic application of a set of ideas, such as relying on markets and deregulation, collectively referred to as neoliberalism. This paper contends that the neoliberal approach is not solving the current and developing problems in food security and agriculture more generally and suggests that more emphasis should be given to alternatives approaches. Seven alternatives approaches are suggested that could be used to identify gaps and guide the creation of overarching goals in economic development and social planning to improve food security and secure the other material goods and social arrangements that all Australians require to live full lives. However, changing large systems such as those involved in food supply is difficult because vested interests in the existing arrangements make the current systems resilient to change. There are a range of leverage points that have differing abilities to change systems. The paper points out that goals and information flows are good leverage points and suggests establishing overarching goals for the systems relevant to food and restructuring the flow of information about these systems will help reform the food supply systems in Australia.
Highlights
Australia is a continent comparable in size to the contiguous states of the United States but it is principally dry land with only the eastern seaboard and south-west Western Australia supporting arable farming
Australia’s commercial food supply and agricultural systems have a negative impact on some people through, for example, poor diet leading to ill health, and have a negative impact on ecosystems through, for example, land and water degradation and biodiversity loss
The outcome of price rises in agricultural inputs, coupled with increasing domestic demand from Australia’s rapidly growing population [1] and exports is likely to lead to food price inflation which will have a negative impact on the affordability of a healthy diet for Australians
Summary
Australia is a continent comparable in size to the contiguous states of the United States but it is principally dry land with only the eastern seaboard and south-west Western Australia supporting arable farming. Australia’s commercial food supply and agricultural systems have a negative impact on some people through, for example, poor diet leading to ill health, (an intra-generational equity issue) and have a negative impact on ecosystems through, for example, land and water degradation and biodiversity loss (an inter-generational equity issue) These negative impacts are likely to be exacerbated by population growth which is predicted to double in sixty years [1], by increasing economic inequity and by the growing impacts of climate change; including changes to rainfall, with more heatwaves and greater storm intensities [2,3,4].
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have