Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to understand the processes through which 5th graders discriminate relevant from irrelevant information when solving mathematical story problems. Visual scanning was recorded and coded as directed toward relevant information, irrelevant information, the question, workspace, and elsewhere. Experiment 1 focused on the effects of irrelevant numerical information, and Experiment 2 focused on irrelevant qualitative information. The visual scanning results showed that higher achieving and lower achieving students generally used question-guided comparisons of the relevant and irrelevant information when they succeeded. A 2nd effective strategy was to discriminate during their initial reading of the problems. In addition, whereas higher achieving students flexibly varied their visual scanning to fit with problem difficulty, the lower achievers showed less flexibility.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.