Abstract
In this article I critically examine the dominant educational justifications for physical education (PE) with specific reference to the significance of movement pleasure. I contextualize the discussion in relation to The New Zealand Curriculum but acknowledge that the argument developed applies more broadly to Western PE. Many sport pedagogues recognize the value of movement pleasure in PE but few overtly accept that the promotion of such pleasure is of legitimate educative value. In contrast, the dominant justifications for PE rest on instrumental and developmental goals. I draw on Morgan (2006) to provide a critique of these goals and emphasize the potential educational value of movement pleasure. I conclude that attempting to understand how pleasures (and displeasures) are socially constructed and effectively managed in PE is a complex but important educational challenge.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.