Abstract

Objective: As electronic laboratory notebook (ELN) capability continues to expand, more researchers are turning to this digital format. The University of Massachusetts Medical School developed new guidelines to outline the retention and transferal of ELNs. How do other universities approach the retention and transferal of laboratory notebooks, including ELNs? Methods: The websites of 25 universities were searched for policies or guidelines on laboratory notebook retention and transferal. A textual analysis of the policies was performed to find common themes. Results: Information on the retention and transferal of laboratory notebooks was found in record retention and research data policies/guidelines. Out of the 25 institutional websites searched, 16 policies/guidelines on research notebook retention were found and 10 institutions had policies/guidelines on transferring research notebooks when a researcher leaves the university. Only one policy had a retention recommendation for storage location specific to electronic media, including laboratory notebooks, that did not apply to its paper counterparts, the remaining policies either explicitly include multiple forms and media or do not mention multiple formats for research records at all. The minimum number of years of retention for research notebooks ranged from immediately after report completion to 7 years after completing the research with the possibility of extension depending on a wide range of external requirements. Most research notebook transferal policies and guidelines required associated researchers and students to request permission from their principal investigator (PI) before taking a copy of the notebook. Most institutions with policies also seek to retain access to research notebooks when a PI leaves an institution to protect intellectual property and respond to any cases of scientific misconduct or conflict of interest. Conclusions: Other universities have a range of approaches for the retention and transferal of laboratory notebooks, but most provide the same recommendations for both electronic and physical laboratory notebooks in their research data or record retention policies/guidelines.

Highlights

  • Laboratory notebooks play an important role in research

  • Continued including laboratory notebooks, that did not apply to its paper counterparts; the remaining policies either explicit ly include multiple forms and media or do not mention multiple formats for research records at all

  • Other universities have a range of approaches for the retention and transferal of laboratory notebooks, but most provide the same recommendations for both electronic and physical laboratory notebooks in their research data or record retention policies/guidelines

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Laboratory notebooks play an important role in research. Do they help a researcher organize and track their experiments (Bird, Willoughby, and Frey 2013), they serve as support for patents (Bird, Willoughby, and Frey 2013; Nickla and Boehm 2011; Heines 2012), evidence of following regulations (Bird, Willoughby, and Frey 2013), and protection against allegations of scientific misconduct (Nickla and Boehm 2011). The advantages of digital space, being cheaper and conducive to collaboration, may warrant different retention for electronic documents such as ELNs. Notebook policies have been used to ensure “timely and accurate signing, dating, and witnessing of each scientist’s laboratory notebook” (Kowalski et al 2002) at research institutions. Policies can be used to mandate the retention and transferal of ELNs

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call