Abstract

The teachers’ right to strike and the children’s right to education are both essential rights recognised by national and international laws in Kenya. Despite this fact, there are instances where conflicts arise between these two rights. The courts have a mandate to balance competing human rights in instances of conflict. However, whenever there has been a conflict between the two rights, Kenyan courts have issued injunctions that require public-school teachers to suspend their strike. By doing so, the courts are leaving the teachers with no effective alternative mechanism to address their pertinent needs. The question of how a balance between the teachers’ right to strike and the children’s right to education in Kenya can be attained is thus an essential concern that is at the focal point of this paper. In a bid to address this question, Kenya’s Constitution, Children’s Act, Labour Relations Act, and case law from the Court of Appeal; namely, TSC v KNUT & 3 others, are analysed to reveal Kenya’s position on the two rights and the various balancing approaches available.

Highlights

  • On one hand, every employee in Kenya is entitled to enjoy the right to strike as espoused in Article 41 of the Constitution of Kenya.[1]

  • Kenyan and United States of America (USA) courts have resorted to granting injunctions whenever these two rights are in conflict.[128]

  • Drawing evidence from the study above, the legal framework calls for respect and protection of both the teachers’ right to strike and the children’s right to education

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Every employee in Kenya is entitled to enjoy the right to strike as espoused in Article 41 of the Constitution of Kenya.[1]. Public-school teachers exercise the right to strike to compel the State, which is their employer, to address their pertinent needs such as an increase in remuneration.[7] Further, teachers resort to strikes as a dispute resolution mechanism to unlock an impasse in the collective bargaining process.[8] these strikes result in a limitation to the children’s fundamental right to education. This seems to contravene the ‘best interest of the child’ principle.

The Theory of Interests
Legal Framework
Balancing competing Interests
Conclusion and Recommendations
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call