Abstract
This paper is about financial contracting choices for the entrepreneur. In an incomplete contracts model, the entrepreneur can design contracts contingent on three possible control right allocations: entrepreneur-control, investor-control, and joint control, with each allocation inducing different effort levels by both the entrepreneur and the investor. Several contracts resembling financial instruments commonly used in practice, such as common stock, straight and convertible preferred equity, and secured and unsecured debt, emerge as potentially optimal. Contractual optimality is shown to depend on entrepreneur/investor input complementarity, and investors' opportunity cost of capital. The results of the model are consistent with, and propose an explanations for, empirical regularities such as a) the prevalence of equity-type contracts in high-growth ventures and of debt-type contracts in lifestyle ventures; b) geographical and temporal differences in equity-type instruments used to finance high-growth ventures.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
