Abstract
Standard economic theory interprets insurance as a means for risk-averse individuals to transfer risk. I argue that another important function of insurance is to optimally finance indivisible expenses that only have value in particular states of nature. Contrary to traditional predictions, insurance is then a normal good, the additional consumption of the covered goods and services by the insured is not a sign of inefficiency, and the marginal-utility gap between states is not informative about the value of insurance. Acknowledging this additional purpose of insurance requires a novel understanding of risk attitudes in general, and a reconsideration and possibly reevaluation of previous policy advice.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
