Abstract

Abstract The value growth rate and equivalent annual income per acre were computed for the maple-birch plots measured at the last two Wisconsin forest inventories. The computations reflected stand growth as well as real price changes between the two inventories. The equivalent annual income averaged $13/ac/yr on industrial forests, and $8.50/ac/yr on public and other private lands. Stand value growth rates, in percent per year, suggested much higher returns, but they are misleading because many of the stands that grew fast were understocked and gave low returns per acre. At the other extreme, some of the best stocked stands (highest basal area) also were poor financial performers. A regression equation showed that the stands of highest equivalent annual income were on better sites, had a basal area of about 80 ft²/ac, a large number of smaller poles ready to become sawtimber, large proportions of oak, elm, ash, and cherry trees, and few aspen or softwoods. No single variable had a major effect by itself, but within the range of the data, by changing all of them together, the annual income on land of average site index could double. North. J. Appl. For. 14(2):59-66.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.