Abstract
The purpose of this research is to determine the differences of financial performance and market performance before, as at, and after direct election for local government executive. This research picks 28 Surabaya based listed companies as samples based on purposive sampling method with several criteria during local government election. Method of hypothesis testing uses multivariate analysis of variance (manova) and Kruskal Wallis test with three groups of periods, which are before, as at, and after the direct election for local government executive. The results show that there is no significant financial performance of local based company in Surabaya caused by direct local government election measured by current ratio, working capital turnover ratio, debt to asset and return to asset ratio. The market performance test shows that the there is significant difference of company’s abnormal return before, as at, and after the direct election for local government executive. Furthermore, the abnormal return after the direct election for local government executive was significant higher than as at the election year.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.