Abstract
In the last decade, mobile money has financially included millions of unbanked people in emerging countries. However, neither country-level institutions nor firm-level strategies alone offer satisfactory explanations for mobile money’s successful and widespread adoption. We therefore analyze which combinations of firm- and country-level factors explain the successful adoption of mobile money services? We perform a fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis on a sample of 96 mobile money deployments in 43 emerging countries. Our findings reveal four distinct recipes for success: ‘Oligopolists’, two variations of ‘Enabling Environments’, and ‘Fintechs’. Oligopolists can be successful irrespective of enabling institutions, if institutional voids are large. Two variations of enabling environments suggest that in most cases either enabling regulation or sufficient mobile and educational infrastructure are key for success. Lastly, a small group of fintechs are successful despite relatively developed financial services sector because the offer technologically sophisticated use cases. These findings provide recipes of how financial inclusion is most achievable in various combinations of firm- and country-level factors and they offer insights for policy makers regarding the necessary institutional framework. Furthermore, we contribute to theory by mobilizing institutional theory to demonstrate the ambiguous nature of institutions for firms with an inclusive business model.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.