Abstract

Financial inclusion is an area of growing global interest in women’s empowerment policy and programming. While increased economic autonomy may be expected to reduce the prevalence of intimate partner violence, the mechanisms and contexts through which this relationship manifests are not well understood. This analysis aims to assess the relationship between women’s financial inclusion and recent intimate partner violence using nationally-representative data from 112 countries worldwide. Levels of both financial inclusion and recent intimate partner violence varied substantially across countries (ranging from 2–100%, and 1–46%, respectively), and across regions. In multivariate global analyses, increased levels of women’s financial inclusion were associated with lower levels of recent intimate partner violence after accounting for asset-based enablers of economic autonomy and gender norms; this relationship was lost upon the inclusion of measures of national context (i.e., development and fragility). These results underscore that the relationship between financial inclusion and recent intimate partner violence is complex, follows many pathways, and is affected by context. In low and middle income countries, asset-based enablers of economic autonomy, gender norms and national context explained much of the relationship between financial inclusion and recent intimate partner violence. In those low and middle income countries with high levels of controlling behavior by male spouses, financial inclusion was associated with higher levels of recent intimate partner violence. These findings further suggest that initiatives that aim to prevent intimate partner violence by way of increased economic autonomy may be ineffective in the absence of broader social change and support, and indeed, as seen in countries with higher levels of men’s controlling behavior, backlash may increase the risk of violence. Efforts to improve women’s financial inclusion need to recognize that its relationship with intimate partner violence is complex, and that it requires an enabling environment supportive of women’s rights and autonomy.

Highlights

  • One in five women globally (19%) have experienced sexual or physical violence from an intimate partner in the past year, with wide variations in prevalence across countries [1]

  • The level and duration of violence reduction seen in interventions designed to boost women’s economic autonomy appears to be context- and population-specific, and in some cases, has been associated with increased rather than decreased intimate partner violence (IPV) risk [5, 10, 11]

  • This study is an ecological analysis of the relationship between financial inclusion and IPV using publicly available, cross-sectional, country-level data from multiple sources

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One in five women globally (19%) have experienced sexual or physical violence from an intimate partner in the past year, with wide variations in prevalence across countries [1]. There has been an increasing focus on modalities of prevention, including ways in which women’s economic autonomy may reduce the risk of IPV. Both preventing IPV and expanding women’s economic autonomy have become prominent features in the global goals and policy agenda [3, 4]. While these two phenomena address distinct areas of women’s lives, there is increasing evidence that they may be linked. The level and duration of violence reduction seen in interventions designed to boost women’s economic autonomy appears to be context- and population-specific, and in some cases, has been associated with increased rather than decreased IPV risk [5, 10, 11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.